IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 53/2007
[2007] NZSC 78
ALEX KWONG WONG
v
THE QUEEN
Court: Blanchard, Tipping and McGrath JJ
Counsel: F C Deliu for Applicant
A Markham for Crown
Judgment: 24 September 2007
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
A The application for leave to appeal is granted.
B The approved ground of appeal is whether there were
“exceptional circumstances relating to the trial” in terms of
s 374(4A) justifying the decision that the trial should proceed with
only 10 jurors.
REASONS
[1] Leave is restricted to the “10 jurors” point. None of the other proposed
grounds raises any arguable issue of general or public importance or any appearance
of a miscarriage of justice.
[2] We are satisfied that there is no realistic prospect that the event which gave
rise to the discharge of the 11th juror, being unrelated to the trial, could have
affected the verdicts, some of which were in favour of the defendants, including the
applicant. The guilty verdicts do not appear unreasonable nor inconsistent with the
acquittals.
[3] We agree with the submission for the Crown that the proposed argument that
the offence of money laundering is “not designed to deal with the proceeds of
specific substantive crimes which are alleged” is plainly unsustainable and that there
is no basis for challenging the decision against severance.
Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington